1 D/L 27 15.10.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.33 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M (M) 2270 of 2026 Sk. Abdus Samad Vs The State of West Bengal In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 arising out of Bhowanipore Police Station Case No. 294 of 2022 dated 12.12.2022 under Sections 120B/170/395/397/467/468/471/34 of the IPC read with Section 25(1B),(a), 27 of the Amrs Act. And In the matter of : Sk. Abdus Samad …Petitioner. Mr. Joydeep Biswas Mr. Koushik Ghosh Mr. Manojit Debnath …for the Petitioner Mr. Kalidas Saha …for the State 1. The learned Advocate representing the petitioner submitted petitioner to be in custody for three years eight months and three days. He referred to an order passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court whereby one of the co-accused persons had been granted bail by order dated 20.04.2026. Thereafter, further nine co-accused persons had been granted bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court and being similarly circumstanced the learned Advocate representing the petitioner seeks for bail accordingly. 2. The learned Advocate representing the State opposed the prayer for bail submitting only 14 witnesses out of 2 proposed 40 witnesses are yet to be concluded and at this stage petitioner shall not be released on bail. 3. Considering the period of detention and the co-accused persons to have been enlarged on bail, the present petitioner to is granted the prayer for bail. 4. Accordingly, Petitioner, namely, Sk Abdus Samad shall furnish bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipore, South 24 Parganas. 5. The petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date fixed before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Trial Court without prior permission from the same and the petitioner shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever and on further condition the petitioner shall meet with the Officer-in-Charge of the local Police Station once a week until further orders. 6. In the event the petitioner fails to appear before the trial Court without justifiable cause, the Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail automatically without reference to this Court. 7. Accordingly, CRM (M) 2270 of 2026 is allowed. 8. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. 3 9. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)