Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3876 RPFC No. 172 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 172 OF 2021
BETWEEN:
SRI MAHENDRA SINGH S/O SRI KISHAN SINGH, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/A NO 712/1, LALITHADRIPURA, MYSURU 570 010
…PETITIONER (BY SRI.M.NAGESH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI.CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT ANITHA @ ANITHA SINGH W/O SRI MAHENDRA SINGH, AGED ABOUT 44
2.
KUMARI DHANYA M D/O SRI MAHENDRA SINGH,
Digitally signed by SOWMYA DODDAMARAIAH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3876 RPFC No. 172 of 2021
AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS BOTH ARE R/A NO 19/A, 6TH CROSS, JANATHA NAGAR, MYSURU 570 009
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. VIVEKANANDA T P., ADVOCATE FOR R1;
R2 SERVED UNREPRESENTED)
THIS RPFC FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 31.08.2021 PASSED IN CRL.MISC.NO.639/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL FAMILY JUDGE, MYSURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 125 OF Cr.P.C.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3876 RPFC No. 172 of 2021
ORAL ORDER Sri. Nagesh.M learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter is settled between the parties amicably and therefore he may be permitted to withdraw the revision petition. Memo to that effect is also filed.
2. No representation on respondents side on call.
3. Permission as prayed for is accorded. Revision petition is thereby dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE
VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 24