Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4942 (UTT)

SBFC FINANCE LTD v. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE DEHRADUN

WPMS/3721/2025 · 2026-01-05

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:118 SL. No. Dat e Of f ice Not es, r ep or t s, or d er s or p r oceed in g s or d ir ect ion s an d Reg ist r ar ’s or d er w it h Sig n at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS W PMS 3 7 2 1 / 2 0 2 5 Hon ’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J. Mr. Sum it Joshi, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel, for the State. Mr. Shobhit Joshi, Advocate, i/ b Mr. Ashish Joshi, Advocate for the respondent no. 4. (2) By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following relief: “A. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to provide police force for ensuring effective compliance of the order dated 19.07.2024, passed under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 by the Hon’ble District Magistrate, Dehradun in Case No. 60 of 2024 for assistance in taking physical possession of the Secured Asset, expeditiously within a period to be determined by this Hon’ble Court in the interest of justice and equity; ” (3) The relief as sought in the writ petition cannot be granted. This Court is not meant for enforcing orders passed by District Magistrate. If petitioner has any grievance, he can approach the concerned authority or can invoke powers under SARFAESI Act, 2002. Writ petition thus fails and is dism issed. ( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.) 5 .1 .2 0 2 6 Pr PRABODH KUMAR Digitally signed by PRABODH KUMAR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3a082a00a95aff911a9559743af8f21c50602ff6eae4e61af3aeab198d462503, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=0DC111E8D8CA66E16B940EFDF806ACCC1AB588052DF6FCA58C67F3C91957B E53, cn=PRABODH KUMAR Date: 2026.01.05 17:54:40 +05'30' 2026:UHC:118