Date of reserved for orders : _ Date of pronouncement : 03.07.2026 Date of uploading : 06.07.2026 APHC010161762026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] FRIDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1615/2026 Between: 1. BURJABARIKI KRISHNA MURTHY, S/O APPALU, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O GANNELA VILLAGE, ARAKUVALLEY MANDAL, ALLURI SEETARAMA RAJU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. BURJABARIKI AMMANNA, S/O LATE MUKUND, AGED 72 YEARS, R/O. GANNELA VILLAGE, ARAKUVALLEY MANDAL, ALLURI SEETARAMA RAJU DISTRICT 531 151. ERSTWHILE VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. BURJABARIKI NATARAJ, S/O AMMANNA, AGED 37 YEARS, R/O GANNELA VILLAGE, ARAKUVALLEY MANDAL, ALLURI SEETARAMA RAJU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT - 531151. 3. BURJABARIKI APPALU, S/O. LATE MUKUND, AGED 68 YEARS, R/O GANNELA VILLAGE, ARAKUVALLEY MANDAL, ALLURI SEETARAMA RAJU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. BURJABARIKI KALAVATHI, S/O APPALU, AGED 49 YEARS, R/O GANNELA VILLAGE, ARAKUVALLEY MANDAL, ALLURI SEETARAMARAJU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2 5. BURJABARIKI SAI BABU, S/O LATE KONDA, AGED 49 YEARS R/O GANNELA VILLAGE, ARAKUVALLEY MANDAL, ALLURI SEETARAMA RAJU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 6. BURJABARIKI JAYARAM, S/O LATE PAPAYYA, AGED 46 YEARS R/O GANNELA VILLAGE, ARAKUVALLEY MANDAL, ALLURI SEETARAMA RAJU DISTRICT. ERSTWHILE VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 7. BURJABARIKI BHEEMANNA, S/O LATE MUKUND, AGED 74 YEARS, R/O GANNELA VILLAGE, ARAKUVALLEY MANDAL, ALLURI SEETARAMA RAJU DISTRICT ERSTWHILE VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 8. BURJABARIKI BOJJA, S/O. LATE MUKUND, AGED 72 YEARS R/O GANNELA VILLAGE, ARAKUVALLEY MANDAL ALLURI SEETARAMA RAJU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toBeing aggrieved by not disposal of I.A. No. 4 of 2022 in A.O.S No. 30 of 2020 on the file of the court of Learned Agency Subordinate Judge, Paderu, IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to dispense with filing of certified copy of Order Dt. 23.04.2022 passed in lA No, 4 of 2022 in AOS No. 30 of 2020 on the file of Agency Subordinate Judge, Paderu and to receive the main CRP on file, in the interests of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SIVA SANKARA RAO BORRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1615 of 2026 ORDER: - The petitioner is the 2nd defendant in A.O.S.No.30 of 2020, on the file of the Agency Subordinate Judge, Paderu, filed by Respondent Nos.1 and 2 herein. 2. Along with the A.O.S. No.30 of 2020, Respondent Nos.1 and 2 herein, filed an application in I.A.No.4 of 2022 seeking temporary injunction in their favour against the suit schedule land. 3. The learned Agency Subordinate Judge, Paderu, by order dated 23.04.2022, directed the plaintiffs and defendants therein, to maintain status- quo, until further orders. 4. In the present civil revision petition, the petitioner contends that, though an interim order is passed in I.A.No.4 of 2022 on 23.04.2022, till now, even after the expiry of four years, the said interlocutory application in I.A.No.4 of 2022 is not disposed of and the Main AOS also not taken up for further proceedings. 5. Mr. Siva Sankara Rao Borra, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that due to the inaction of the Court below in disposing of I.A.No.4 of 2022, for a long time, the petitioner is put to heavy loss and hardship and sought a direction to the learned Agency Subordinate Judge, Paderu, to dispose of A.O.S.No.30 of 2020 expeditiously, in the interest of justice. 4 6. Having considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and upon careful examination of the material available on record, it is true that the learned Agency Subordinate Judge, Paderu, by order dated 23.04.2022 in I.A.No.4 of 2022 in A.O.S.No.30 of 2020, passed an interim order directing the plaintiffs and defendants therein to maintain status-quo until further orders. The grievance of the petitioner is that, thereafter, the said I.A. is not disposed of and the main case also not taken up for consideration. 7. Considering the fact that the main case is of the year 2020 and I.A.No.4 of 2022 is pending for the last four years, in our considered view, it is appropriate and desirable to direct the learned Agency Subordinate Judge, Paderu, to dispose of A.O.S.No.30 of 2020 as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three (03) months, to meet the interest of justice. 8. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned Agency Subordinate Judge, Paderu, to dispose of A.O.S.No.30 of 2020 on its file, in accordance with law, as early as possible preferably within a period of three (03) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 9. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND Date: 03.07.2026 SA 5 Whether the order is : Speaking 𝑌𝑒𝑠 /No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable 𝑌𝑒𝑠 /No 6 𝟔𝟗 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.1615 of 2026 Date: 03.07.2026 SA