Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 49404 (KAR)

SMT GAYITRAMMA v. UNION BANK OF INDIA

WP/20654/2022 · 2026-01-09

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1233 WP No. 20654 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 20654 OF 2022 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. SMT GAYITRAMMA W/O R BASAVARAJA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS DOOR NO.2396/1 AND 2 SITE NO.661, MCC A BLOCK DAVANAGERE …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M.R. HIREMATHAD, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. UNION BANK OF INDIA MANDIPET BRANCH DAVANAGERE REP BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER / THE AUTHORISED OFFICER - 577 001 2. K RAJASHEKHARAPPA S/O KOTRAPPA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, KARIGANOOR VILLAGE Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1233 WP No. 20654 of 2022 CHANNAGIRI TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT - 577 006 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T.P. MUTHANNA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 R2 SD) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO FURNISH THE DETAIL OF LOAN AND RECOVERY PROCEEDINGS THEREON INCLUDING SALE BY WAY OF AUCTION IF CONDUCTED, AND QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS IN OA.NO.353/2022 PENDING BEFORE DRT BENGALURU, PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-F AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1233 WP No. 20654 of 2022 ORAL ORDER The present writ petition is filed seeking the following prayer: “Wherefore the petitioner respectfully prays that: To issue the writ of mandamus by directing the respondent to furnish the detail of loan and recovery proceedings thereon including sale by way of auction if conducted and kindly be issue the writ of certiorari by quashing the proceedings in OA No.353/2022 pending before DRT Bengaluru, produced at Annexure-F, and Pass such other direction in the interest of justice and equity.” 2. When the matter came up on 22.11.2022, the Co- ordinate Bench of this Court had passed the following order: "Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would restrict his submission to a direction to respondent No.1-Bank to divulge the sale details of the property belonging to the petitioner that has allegedly been sold by respondent No.1 - Bank. Therefore, the learned counsel, Sri. T.P. Muthanna is directed to accept notice for respondent No.1 and issue emergent notice to respondent No.2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is directed to serve a copy of the petition papers upon the learned counsel, Sri. T.P. Muthanna." - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1233 WP No. 20654 of 2022 3. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1/Bank submits that as per the interim order dated 22.11.2022, thay have already given information to the petitioner, hence, nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition. 5. Heard learned counsel appearing for the respondent. Perused the order dated 22.11.2022 and the prayer that is sought in the writ petition. 6. In the light of the order dated 22.11.2022, as the respondents have already given information, nothing survives for consideration. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE PSJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25