Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 49401 (CAL)

MOHAMMED MARUF UDDIN MALLIK v. THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS

WPA/25601/2026 · 2026-10-13

Supratim Bhattacharya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

13.10.2026 Ct. no. 21 SL. 264 Samarpita In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA/25601/2026 MOHAMMED MARUF UDDIN MALLIK VS THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS Mr. Mijanul Kabir, Ms. Luna Khatoon, Ms. Riya Ghosh .. for the Petitioner Ms. Anamika Pandey, .. for ECI 1. The learned advocate representing the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not given the opportunity of hearing and his name has been deleted. 2. Heard the learned Advocate representing the Election Commission of India considering the fact that the petitioner has not been given the opportunity of hearing, the Tribunal is requested to hear out the matter with the further request to dispose of the same as the earliest preferably within three months after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 3. The learned counsel representing the Election Commission of India also admits the fact. 4. Heard the learned advocates considering of the petitioner, the Tribunal is requested to dispose of the matter at the earliest, preferably within three months from the date of receipt of the communication, considering the special circumstance. 5. The EPIC number of the petitioner is TGC2182491. 6. Accordingly, W.P.A. 25601 of 2026 is disposed of. 2 7. There shall be no order as to cost. 8. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of requisite formalities. (Supratim Bhattacharya, J.)