Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 49385 (CAL)

SOHINI CHAKRABORTY v. SHIRSAK DEY

CO/3574/2026 · 2026-10-14

Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. 6 (265719) 14.10.2026 (AD 22) (S. Banerjee) CO 3574 of 2026 Sohini Chakraborty Vs. Shirsak Dey Mr. Debrup Chowdhury Mr. Gopal Krishna Maiti …for the petitioner This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the wife praying for a direction upon the learned Additional District Judge, 7th Court at Barasat to dispose of MAT Suit No. 1974 of 2024 expeditiously. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed a counter-claim and October 15, 2026 is fixed for filing of the written statement against the counter-claim. In view of the order sought and proposed to be passed, there is no necessity to direct issuance of any notice upon the opposite party. However, the learned advocate-on-record of the petitioner shall be obliged to forward a copy of this application along with a server copy of this order, upon the opposite party or upon the learned advocate representing the opposite party before the learned trial judge forthwith. 2 In the light of the submission made by the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner, this revisional application stands disposed of by requesting the learned Additional District Judge, 7th Court at Barasat to dispose of MAT Suit No. 1974 of 2024 and the counter-claim as expeditiously as possible without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. (Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)