M/S ADI KESHAVA EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED v. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER
WP/21379/2025 · 2026-01-06
Ashok S Kinagi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 49381 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 49381 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:672 WP No. 21379 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 21379 OF 2025 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN:
1.
M/S ADI KESHAVA EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED 777/45, NAGARUR, HUSKUR ROAD, DASANAPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA 562123, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
2.
KESHVARAMU H R, S/O RAMAIAH, 777/45, NAGARUR, HUSKUR ROAD, DASANAPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA 562123.
3.
SHWETHA H K D/O KESHAVARAMU H R, 777/45, NAGARUR, HUSKUR ROAD, DASANAPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU,
Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:672 WP No. 21379 of 2025
KARNATAKA - 562123.
4.
SHRUTHI H K D/O KESHAVARAMU H R, 777/45, NAGARUR, HUSKUR ROAD, DASANAPURA HOBLI, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA 562123. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. M A RAJENDRA., ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE AUTHORISED OFFICER CANARA BANK, CHIKKABIDARAKALLU, JINDAL NAGAR, NAGASANDRA P.O, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA 560073.
…RESPONDENT (BY SRI. VIGNESH SHETTY, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO (I) QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 24.06.2025 PASSED BY THE DRT-I, BENGALURU IN S.A. NO.619/2024 (ANNEXURE -A) (II) DIRECT THE DRT-I, BENGALURU TO RESTORE AND RE-HEAR THE S.A. NO.619/2024 ON MERITS BY CONDONING THE DELAY OF 3 DAYS IN PHYSICAL FILING.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:672 WP No. 21379 of 2025
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter is settled out of the Court, and in view of the same nothing survives for consideration in the petition. Hence, the writ petition may be disposed of having become infructuous.
2. Submission is placed on record.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE
SKS CT:KHV