Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4649 WP No. 22798 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 22798 OF 2024 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
SMT. NALINI MOHAN D/O LATE V RAJAGOPALA REDDY W/O SRI N MOHAN AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/A NO.15 C K GARDEN WHEELER ROAD EXTENSION ST THOMAS TOWN BANGALORE 560084. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SYED PEER ULLA SHA KHADRI., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE NORTH SUB DIVISION BANGALORE 560001.
2.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS TAHSILDAR BANGALORE NORTH (ADDITIONAL) TALUK BANGALORE 560001.
3.
MR MOHAMMED HUSAIN SAHIB SAAB S/O ABDUL REHMAN SAHIB SAAB
Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4649 WP No. 22798 of 2024
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/A NO.77 SHAMANA LAYOUT LINGARAJPURAM, BANGALORE 560084. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V.SESHU., HCGP FOR R1, R2)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER AND TRANSFER THE KHATHA AND MUTATION RECORDS IN FAVOR OF PETITIONER VIDE ANNEXURE-E .
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
ORAL ORDER
On the previous hearing, the following order was passed:
“Learned High Court Government Pleader takes notice for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to serve copies of the petition along with annexures on the learned High Court Government Pleader.
Since the petitioner is requesting the 2nd respondent Tahsildar, Bangalore North (Additional) Taluk, to enter his name on the strength of a
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4649 WP No. 22798 of 2024
registered sale deed and the orders passed by the Karnataka State Appellate Tribunal, setting aside the orders passed by the Assistant Commissioner and competent authority who had invoked Sections 79A and B of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961, the learned High Court Government Pleader is
directed to secure instructions from the Tahsildar as to why the name of the petitioner is not being entered in the revenue records.
Re-list this matter on 28.01.2026.”
2. Today, the learned High Court Government Pleader has furnished copy of the recent RTC showing the name of the petitioner in Column No.9.
3. In that view of the matter, the writ petition stands
disposed of since the grievance of the petitioner is redressed.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
JT CT: JL