Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4935 (RAJ)

GYANSINGH S/O SHRI SUMER SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3350/2026 · 2026-04-06

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:14131] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3350/2026 Gyansingh S/o Shri Sumer Singh, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Kiratsingh Pura (Udanwas), Police Station Behror Sadar, District Kothputli-Behror (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Kishangarh). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.R. Dhakad, PP Mr. H.K. Sharma, for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 06/04/2026 1. This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 386/2025 registered at Police Station Kotkasim, District Khairthal-Tijara for offences u/S 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 351(2) & 351(3) of BNS. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and the counsel for the complainant. 4. The accused petitioner has been implicated as an accused in this criminal case in view of the fact that a vehicle used in commission of the offence is registered in the name of the accused petitioner. The accused petitioner is said to have been in custody since 31.01.2026. Learned counsel for the accused [2026:RJ-JP:14131] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3350/2026] petitioner has also submitted that co-accused persons namely; Deshraj, Amit, Devendra Kuamr and Naresh have already been enlarged on bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 06.02.2026 in Bail Application No. 2268/2026 and the present accused petitioner has not been named in the FIR. 5. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that the accused petitioner has been arrayed as an accused merely because his vehicle has been found in commission of the offence and the co- accused persons named above have already been enlarged on bail so also the fact that the present accused has not been named on the FIR, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of this case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail 6. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /45