Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4935 (ALL)

MAHENDRA SINGH DHANGAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/33275/2026 · 2026-09-08

Saral Srivastava, Sudhanshu Chauhan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33275 of 2026 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Sri Rajesh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner does not want to press the writ petition as he wants to avail appropriate remedy available in law. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. September 9, 2026 SS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Mahendra Singh Dhangar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad