Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 49340 (CAL)

MEHABUB ALAM PURAKAIT v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA(H)/95/2026 · 2026-10-15

Aryak Dutt, Debangsu Basak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Dd 1 15.10.2026 (Bench ID-266447 ) In the High Court At Calcutta CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA(H)/95/2026 MEHABUB ALAM PURAKAIT VS THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. Mr. Sabyasachi Chatterjee, Advocate Mr. Akashdeep Mukherjee, Advocate Mr. Badrul Karim, Advocate Mr. Aritra Ghosh, Advocate … … For the Petitioner Mr. Rajdeep Majumder, AAG Mr. Dibashis Basu, AGP Ms. Sneha Dutta, Jr. Govt. Adv. Mr. Prasanta Naskar, Advocate … … For the State Mr. Sankar Paul, Advocate Mr. Arkaprobho Roy, Advocate Mr. Syed Murshid Alam, Advocate .. …For the Respondent No.9 1. Petitioner claims that despite marriage on December 16, 2025, private respondent took away his wife. Daughter of the private respondent is claimed to be the wife of the petitioner. 2. Petitioner, State and the private respondent are represented. 3. Report submitted on behalf of the State be taken on record. 4. By an order dated October 14, 2026, we directed the private respondent to produce his daughter in Court in order to ascertain the views of the daughter. 2 5. Daughter of the private respondent is present in Court and was identified by the learned advocate for the private respondent. 6. In response to a query of the Court the daughter of the private respondent through the learned advocate for the private respondent states that she wants to stay with her father, that is the private respondent. 7. Apparently, the daughter of the private respondent is an adult. 8. In view of the stand taken by the daughter of the private respondent, no further order is called for in this habeas corpus writ petition. 9. WPA(H)/95/2026 is accordingly disposed of. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Aryak Dutt, J.) DEBABRATA DAS Digitally signed by DEBABRATA DAS Date: 2026.10.15 14:39:10 +05'30'