Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 49334 (MAD)

M.Sukanya v. The Superintendent of Police

WP Crl./1546/2026 · 2026-07-06

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP Crl. No. 1546 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN WP Crl. No. 1546 of 2026 M.Sukanya W/o Manikandan, NO.41M4, Marakkal Kadu, Near K.O.N.Theatre, Kumarapalayam, Namakkal. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Superintendent of Police Namakkal. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Kumarapalayam Sub-Division, Namakkal. 3. The Inspector Of Police Kumarapalayam Police Station, Namakkal. 4. Thangavel S/o Krishna Gounder, Residing at, No.11a, Kattuvalavu, Ammapalayam, Mylampatti, Thevur Village, Sankagiri, Salem. 5. Arulkumar S/o Thangavel, Residing at, No.11a, Kattuvalavu, Ammapalayam, Mylampatti, Thevur Village, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 1546 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 Sankagiri, Salem. 6. Gowtham S/o Thangavel, Residing at, No.11a, Kattuvalavu, Ammapalayam, Mylampatti, Thevur Village, Sankagiri, Salem. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 3rd respondent to grant police protection for clearing and using the pathway leading to the petitioners land which extends of 0.73 cents of agricultural land situted at Thevur Village, Mylampatti, Ammapalayam, Kattuvalavu, Namakkal. For Petitioner(s): Ms.G.Kaviya For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu ORDER The Writ Petition has been filed seeking for direction to the 3rd respondent to grant police protection for clearing and using the pathway leading to the petitioners land which extends of 0.73 cents of agricultural land situted at Thevur Village, Mylampatti, Ammapalayam, Kattuvalavu, Namakkal. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 1546 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was unable to utilise the said pathway for the past six months, since the respondents 4 to 6 are continuously objecting. 3. It is seen that there is a civil dispute pending between the parties and therefore, police protection cannot be granted for clearing the pathway or securing access and the petitioner ought to have approached the competent Civil Court for appropriate relief. 4. This Court is of the view that police protection cannot be granted in a civil dispute. However, it is made clear that if any cognizable offence is committed by respondents 4 to 6, the 3rd respondent shall take immediate action in accordance with law. 5. With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. 06-07-2026 SMA https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 1546 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. SMA To 1. The Superintendent of Police Namakkal. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Kumarapalayam Sub-Division, Namakkal. 3. The Inspector Of Police Kumarapalayam Police Station, Namakkal. 4. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court. WP Crl. No. 1546 of 2026 06-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis