R.REVATHI(WHC 1747) v. The Additional Chief secretary to the Government
WP/26657/2026 · 2026-07-13
P T Asha
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 49326 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 49326 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 26657 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 7 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA WP No. 26657 of 2026 AND WMP NO. 29456 OF 2026 R.Revathi (WHC 1747) ..Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The Additional Chief secretary to the Government Home Department Fort St.George, Chennai
2. The Director General of Police Kamarajar salai Chennai-600 004
3. The Superintendent of police District Police Office Namakkal District ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the 3rd respondent in order dated 19.6.2026 bearing Na.Ka.No.L-2/438/E-14236427/2026 and quash the same as arbitrary illegal and without any basis and consequently direct the 1st and 2nd https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 26657 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 7 respondents to grant maternity leave to the petitioner from 14.7.2026 to
13.7.2027. For Petitioner(s): Mr. Abinesh Babu For Respondent(s): Mr.K.Sathish Government Advocate ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed for the following relief:-
“To issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the 3rd respondent in order dated 19.6.2026 bearing Na.Ka.No.L-2/438/E-14236427/2026 and quash the same as arbitrary illegal and without any basis and consequently direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to grant maternity leave to the petitioner from 14.7.2026 to 13.7.2027.”
2. The petitioner would submit that she had joined the service as a Women Police Constable on 01.03.2009 and is presently working as a Head Constable in All Women’s Police Station a Namakkal Police Station. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 26657 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 7
3. The petitioner would submit that she got married in the year 2015 and was blessed with two children born on 12.2015 and 12.12.2018. She is presently pregnant with her third child and is due to deliver shortly. 4. The petitioner would further submit that on 19.06.2026, she had submitted a representation to the 3rd respondent, through proper channel, seeking maternity leave in the light of the G.O. (Ms.) No.18, Human Resources Management Department, dated 13.03.2026. However, the same was rejected by the 3rd Respondent vide proceedings in Na.Ka.L-2/438/E-14236427/2026 dated 19.06.2026 on the ground that maternity leave cannot be granted for the third child. Challenging the same, the petitioner is before this Court. 5. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the records. 6.
It is seen that the 3rd respondent while passing the impugned order had failed to take into consideration the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of K. Uma Devi Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu and Others, reported in 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1204, wherein the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 26657 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 7 Hon’ble Supreme Court extended the benefit of maternity leave even in respect of the third child. 7. Further, in pursuance of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Uma Devi's case cited supra, the Government of Tamil Nadu had issued G.O. (Ms.) No.18, Human Resources Management Department, dated 13.03.2026, amending the Fundamental Rules to extend the benefit of maternity leave to married women Government servants in respect of their third child. However, the duration of such leave has been restricted to 12 weeks (three months). The Division of this Court in W.P.No.40841 of 2025 dated 24.06.2026 held that in view of G.O. (Ms.) No.18, Human Resources Management Department, dated 13.03.2026, maternity leave in respect of the third child shall be governed by the amended Fundamental Rules. Accordingly, a married woman Government servant having two or more surviving children is entitled only to 12 weeks' maternity leave for the third child. 8. In view of the above, the impugned order dated 19.06.2026 passed by the 3rd respondent is quashed. The 3rd respondent is directed to implement the dicta laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 26657 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 7 of Uma Devi cited supra and the subsequent Government Order issued in this regard, namely G.O. (Ms.) No.18, Human Resources Management Department, dated 13.03.2026, and grant maternity leave to the petitioner for the period prescribed therein. The learned counsel for the petitioner would also agree that the duration of maternity leave for the third child has been reduced to 12 weeks, as per G.O. (Ms.) No.18, Human Resources Management Department, dated 13.03.2026. 9. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
13-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No SRN https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 26657 of 2026 __________ Page6 of 7 To
1. The Additional Chief secretary to the Government Home Department Fort St.George, Chennai
2. The Director General of Police Kamarajar salai Chennai-600 004
3. The Superintendent of police District police office Namakkal District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 26657 of 2026 __________ Page7 of 7 P.T.ASHA J. SRN WP No. 26657 of 2026 AND WMP NO. 29456 OF 2026 13-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis