M/s. Sri Rayalaseema Alkalies & Allied Chemical Limited v. Transmission Corporation of A.P. Limited (AP Transco)
WP/26436/2010 · 2026-07-02
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4931 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4931 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
Date of reserved for orders : - Date of pronouncement : 03.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010073232010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] FRIDAY, THE 3rd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 26436/2010 Between:
1. M/S. SRI RAYALASEEMA ALKALIES & ALLIED CHEMICAL LIMITED, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE & FACTORY AT GANDIPARLA VILLAGE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, T.G. VENKATESH
...PETITIONER AND
1. TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF A P LIMITED AP TRANSCO, VIDYUT SOUDHA, SOMAJIGUDA, HYDERAABAD
2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER COMMERCIAL, TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF A.P. LIMITED (AP TRANSCO) VIDYUT SOUDHA, SOMAJIGUDA, HYDERAABAD
3. THE FINANCIAL ADVISOR CHIEF CONTROLLER OF ACCOUNTS, (A.E & R) TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF A.P. LIMITED (AP TRANSCO) VIDYUT SOUDHA, SOMAJIGUDA, HYDERAABAD
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order of direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the demand of "State Load Dispatch Centre" (SLDC) operating charges from the petitioner as highly illegal, arbitrary,
2
unjust, contrary and violative of Articles 14, 19 (1) (g) of the constitution of India and consequently set aside the demand notices raised by the 3rd Respondent from the months May, 2007 to September, 2010 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2010(WPMP 33760 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents not to levy and collect the "State Load Dispatch Centre" (SLDC) operating charges from the petitioner, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. D V NAGARJUNA BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. O MANOHAR REDDY(SC FOR APTRANSCO)
2.
V V SATISH The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO:26436/2010 ORDER:
The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following relief:
“to issue a writ or order of direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the demand of "State Load Dispatch Centre" (SLDC) operating charges from the petitioner as highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust, contrary and violative of Articles 14, 19 (1) (g) of the constitution of India and consequently set aside the demand notices raised by the 3rdRespondent from the months May, 2007 to September, 2010 and passsuch other order or orders….”
2. Sri V. Hemanth Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that despite best efforts, he could not contact the petitioner. 3. As the learned counsel has no instructions from the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed for Non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. _______________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 03.07.2026 Vns
4
Whether the order is :
Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No
Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No