Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 49303 (CAL)

SAMIRON BISWAS v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/23284/2026 · 2026-10-15

Partha Sarathi Sen

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

N.22Sl 151/CL 15.10.2026 DL-16 & 17 Ct.19 (S.R.) WPA 23284 of 2026 Samiron Biswas v. The State of West Bengal & Ors. With WPA 23289 of 2026 Nikhil Biswas & Ors. v. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Mahim Sasmal … for the petitioner(s). Mr. Mihir Kumar Das Mr. Mainak Chandra … for the State. (in WPA 23284 of 2026) Mr. Shiv Shankar Banerjee Mr. Surajit Singh … for the State. (in WPA 23289 of 2026) 1. The writ petitioners in both the writ petitions and the respondent State also in both the writ petitioners are represented by their respective learned counsel. 2. On behalf of the respondent State two separate reports have been filed in connection with the instant two writ petitions, which are taken on record. 3. On careful perusal of the instant two instant two writ petitions, it appears to this Court that it is the grievance of the present two writ petitioners that though they are regular employees of the respondent no.10 Co-operative Society but both the writ petitioners are prevented from attending their duty in the said Co-operative Society by some undesirable persons of the society and despite due approach made by the writ petitioners with the local police authorities, no assistance is rendered to them. 4. Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent State drawing attention to page no.2 of the instant two reports submits before this Court that the writ petitioners in the instant two writ petitions have approached this Court on the basis of mere apprehension. It is submitted further that the jurisdictional Officer-in-charge has assured that, in the event, the writ petitioners face any threat to their security in respect of their life and person and, in the event, any approach is made by the writ petitioners to the said jurisdictional Officer- in-charge due assistance will be given. 5. In view of such, this Court while disposing the instant writ petition directs the Officer-in-charge of Hanskhali Police Station, District – Nadia to give due assistance of police to both the writ petitioners, in the event, while attending their duties in the office of the respondent no.10 Cooperative Society, they face any threat to their security regarding their personal life. 2 6. With the aforementioned observations, WPA 23284 of 2026 and WPA 23289 of 2026 stand disposed of. 7. Liberty is given to the learned advocate-on-record for the writ petitioners to communicate the server copy of this order to the Officer-in-charge of Hanskhali Police Station, District – Nadia, who is directed to act on the server copy of this order 8. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. 9. Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all the necessary formalities. (Partha Sarathi Sen, J.) 3