Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4930 (ALL)

ABHILASH AND 3 OTHERS v. AMOD KUMAR AND 2 OTHERS

A227/12312/2026 · 2026-09-08

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12312 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This is a defendants' petition. In the suit filed by the plaintiff- respondents, an application for grant of temporary injunction 6C was filed, in which, objections have been preferred by the defendants, which is pending consideration. The prayer is for expediting 6C application along with the objection. 2. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon court concerned to decide the temporary injunction application 6-C considering the objection filed by the defendant-petitioners, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 3. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. 4. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. September 9, 2026 A. V. Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Yashwant Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Abhilash And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) Amod Kumar And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad