Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4929 (GAU)

KULDEEP CHOUDHURY v. SRI KAUSTHAB CHOUDHURY

I.A.(Civil)/454/2026 · 2026-02-23

Mridul Kumar Kalita

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010225472025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/454/2026 KULDEEP CHOUDHURY S/O LT. KSHOUNISH CHANDRA CHOUDHURY R/O PADMA NAGAR BILPAR P.O. SILCHAR DIST. CACHAR ASSAM PIN 788001 VERSUS SRI KAUSTHAB CHOUDHURY S/O LT. KSHOUNISH CHANDRA CHOUDHURY R/O PADMA NAGAR BILPAR P/O-SILCHAR DIST- CACHAR ASSAM PIN-788001 PRESENTLY RESIDING AT H/O SHYAMAL DEY RMS COLONY P/O- RANGIA RS DISTRICT-KAMRUP PIN-781365 ASAAM OFFICE ADDRESS- KAUSTHAB CHOUDHUR INSPECTOR POSTS GH-2ND SUB-DIVISION RANGIA RS DIST. KAMRUP PIN 781365 ------------ Advocate for : MR. D MOZUMDER Page No.# 2/2 Advocate for : appearing for SRI KAUSTHAB CHOUDHURY BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER Date : 24.02.2026 1. Heard Mr. D. Mozumdar, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. This interlocutory application has been filed by the applicant/appellant in connection with connected FAO No. 71/2025. 3. In this interlocutory application, the applicant has prayed for allowing the applicant to bring the correct address of the respondent in the memo of appeal as indicated in paragraph No. 5 of the instant interlocutory application. 4. The prayer is allowed. 5. The applicant is allowed to rectify the address of the sole respondent in the connected appeal by filing an amended memo of appeal. 6. This interlocutory application is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant