Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 49244 (KAR)

SRI NARASAMMA v. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

MFA/250/2020 · 2026-01-07

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:935 MFA No. 250 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 250 OF 2020 (LAC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. NARASAMMA W/O LATE MUDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS 2. KUM. M.NETHRAVATHI D/O LATE MUDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS 3. KUM. PUSPARANI D/O LATE MUDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF THEETHA, KOLALA HOBLI, KORATAGERE TALUK, TUMKURU DISTRICT - 572129. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. NANJA REDDY P.N., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, MADHUGIRI, TUMKUR DISTRICT. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, HEMAVATHI CHANNEL ZONE, KUNIGAL ROAD, ALASHETTIKERE TUMKUR-572101 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA RAYAPPA, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:935 MFA No. 250 of 2020 THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 54(1) OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED AS UNDER: ORAL JUDGMENT Though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. The appeal is listed today for orders regarding non compliance with office objection for the third time. 2. A perusal of the appeal papers shows that the appeal was filed in 2020. It is almost five years. The appellants have not shown interest in compliance with the office objection. The conduct of the appellants depicts that they are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. 3. Hence the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution and also non compliance of office objections. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16