14.10.2026 Ct. No. 654 Sl. No. 04 Subadip CO 608 of 2026 Sangita Samanta @ Sanghita Samanta VS Shyamal Samanta Mr. Kaushik Dey, Mr. Ziaul Haque, Mr. Arup Bhattacharjee, Ms. Debjani Halder. …for the petitioner Mr. Prabal Mukherjee, Sr. Adv. Ms. Shebatee Datta. …for the opposite party 1. Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioner be kept with the record. 2. The petitioner is a defendant in the suit in Misc. Case No. 315 of 2025. 3. The petitioner is aggrieved by and order dated 31st January, 2026. By the said order the learned Trial Judge has formulated manner of physical visitation and also visitation through video conference for the petitioner/father before the learned Trial Court. 4. Both the parties are represented. 5. The petitioner before this Court points of that an application for production of the minor children before the learned Court had been filed on 3rd January, 2026. By the said application, the petitioner wanted the learned Court to interact with the minor children in order to find out whether the 2 visitation right as claimed by their father ought to be granted by the learned Trial Court. 6. The petitioner’s grievances is that such application which filed on 3rd January, 2026 has not been disposed of till date and the application filed by the father for visitation of the children has been allowed by the learned Trial Court. 7. In such view of the matter, the learned Additional District Judge, 4th Court, Howrah is requested to dispose of the said application filed by the opposite party/wife on 3rd January, 2026 within a period of two weeks after reopening of the Court after the ‘puja vacation’. Such application shall be disposed in accordance with law and without granting any unnecessary adjournment to any of the parties. 8. The learned Trial Judge shall decide such application without being influenced by any observation made in this order or the impugned Order No.6 dated 31st January, 2026. 9. With the above observation, C.O. 608 of 2026 is disposed of. (Aryak Dutt, J.)