Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4451 RSA No. 1370 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1370 OF 2022 BETWEEN:
SRI RADHA KRISHNA S/O LATE MALLAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT SEEGEHALLI VILLAGE, VIRGONAGAR POST, KR PURAM HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU. …APPELLANT (BY SRI SAMUEL S DANDIN, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND:
SRI T.RADHAKRISHNA S/O SRI CHIKKATHIMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT NO. 41, 2nd CROSS, GOKULA EXTENSION, DEVASANDRA, K R PURAM BENGLURU - 560 036. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI V PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR C/R)
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.06.2022 PASSED IN RA.NO.41/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGLAURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU.
DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 06.04.2016 PASSED IN O.S.NO.1483/2008 ON THE
Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:4451 RSA No. 1370 of 2022
FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JDUGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU.
THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
ORAL JUDGMENT This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for sixth time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellant was
directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellant is not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 43