Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16402 CRL.P No. 12082 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 12082 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN:
1.
MR. CHETHAN M HEGDE S/O LATE K M HEGDE AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/O HOUSE NO A 203, RAM KI USTAV APARTMENT NEW B E L ROAD SEENAPPA LAYOUT R M V EXTENSION 2ND STAGE BENGALURU – 010
2.
MR PRASHANTH REDDY V S/O V SIDDA REDDY AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/O HOUSE NO 388, 2ND STAGE, 2ND PHASE 14TH B CROSS ROAD WEST OF CHORD ROAD MAHALAKSHMI PURAM BENGALURU - 010 …PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. PARAMESHWAR N HEGDE., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY VIDHANA SOUDHA POLICE STATION
Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16402 CRL.P No. 12082 of 2023
REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE – 01
2.
MR CHANDRASHEKHAR KUNNUR FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/O GURUKRUPA RESIDENCY NO. 536, G.2, 2ND MAIN R M V DOLLARS COLONY BENGALURU CITY KARNATAKA - 560094
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. B.N. JAGADEESHA, ADDL. SPP FOR R1 SRI. SANDEEP PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.12776/2022 REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 341, 323, 504, 506 R/W SEC. 34 OF IPC, PENDING ON THE FILE OF XXXIX ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE AT BANGALORE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16402 CRL.P No. 12082 of 2023
ORAL ORDER
1.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows:
“MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL
It is submitted that, in the above petition the petitioner has challenged the entire proceedings of the trial Court based on the charge sheet. It is submitted due to commencement of the trial, the petitioner intends to withdraw the petition. Wherefore, in view of the above, this Hon’ble Court be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the petition as not pressed reserving the liberty to file fresh petition if occasion arises in the interest of justice and equity. ”
2. In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE RK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 106