Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 49184 (KAR)

KRISHNAPPA POOJARI v. JAYALAXMI

RSA/1104/2025 · 2026-01-22

Ravi V Hosmani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3971 RSA No. 1104 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1104 OF 2025 (POS) BETWEEN: KRISHNAPPA POOJARI AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O LATE RAMA POOJARI, R/A SAGRI, KUNJIBETTU, UDUPI - 576 102. …APPELLANT (BY SRI HARISH M G.,ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. JAYALAXMI AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, W/O LATE LAXMINARAYANA BHAT 2. MALATHI, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, D/O LATE LAXMINARAYANA BHAT 3. MALLIKA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, D/O LATE LAXMINARAYANA BHAT 4. RAMESHA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, S/O LATE LAXMINARAYANA BHAT 5. 6. SRINIVASA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, S/O LATE LAXMINARAYANA BHAT VITTALA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, S/O LATE LAXMINARAYANA BHAT, Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3971 RSA No. 1104 of 2025 ALL ARE R/AT SAGRI, KUNJIBETTU, UDUPI - 576 102. …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 04.07.2023 PASSED IN RA NO.13/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, CJM, UDUPI, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 26.02.2021 PASSED IN OS NO.681/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, UDUPI, AND ETC., THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for fourth time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellant was directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellant is not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 49