Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4918 (PNJ)

BHUPINDER SINGH ETC v. PB.ST.

RFA/3162/2003 · 2026-01-30

Harkesh Manuja

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RFA-316 119 (3) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Jagraj Singh and anr. State of Punjab and others CORAM: Present: HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) CM-2945 Jagraj Singh and appellant No.2 for, subject to all just exceptions. The applicant and 3 of the application are representative Gurnam Singh, respectively MAIN CASE Vs. The Punjab State and another 30.01.2026 sanjay 3164-2003 (O&M) [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** RFA Date of Decision: 30.01.2026 Jagraj Singh and anr. Versus State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. M.L. Sarin, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ritesh Aggarwal, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Raman Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.3. -.- HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) 5-CI-2025 Application for impleading the LRs of appellant No. Jagraj Singh and appellant No.2-Gurnam Singh for, subject to all just exceptions. The applicant of the application are ordered to be brought on record as legal sentatives of appellant No.1-Jagraj Singh and appellant No.2 Gurnam Singh, respectively, to pursue the present appeal. Amended memo of parties is taken on record. Registry to tag the same at appropriate place. MAIN CASE: For orders, see RFA-2760 Vs. The Punjab State and another, decided vide order of even date. 30.01.2026 Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether Reportable? ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA-3164-2003 (O&M) Date of Decision: 30.01.2026 …….Appellants Versus ..….Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Mr. M.L. Sarin, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ritesh Aggarwal, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Raman Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.3. for impleading the LRs of appellant No. Gurnam Singh is allowed, as prayed for, subject to all just exceptions. The applicants mentioned in para ordered to be brought on record as legal Jagraj Singh and appellant No.2 to pursue the present appeal. Amended memo of parties is taken on record. Registry to tag the same at appropriate place. 2760-2003, titled as Kartar Kaur , decided vide order of even date. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Yes/No for impleading the LRs of appellant No.1- allowed, as prayed paras 2 ordered to be brought on record as legal Jagraj Singh and appellant No.2- Kartar Kaur , decided vide order of even date. (HARKESH MANUJA) SANJAY GUPTA 2026.02.03 17:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document