Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 49170 (KAR)

SMT. MANJULA K K. v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/21236/2024 · 2026-01-07

H T Narendra Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:778 WP No. 21236 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 21236 OF 2024 (S-TR) BETWEEN: SMT. MANJULA K K W/O Y P PRAKASH AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS WORKING AS SENIOR HEALTH INSPECTOR OFFICE OF THE CITY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL MADANAYAKANAHALLI BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT R/AT NO.41, SHANTHA NILAYAM 2ND CROSS, 2ND MAIN, BALAJI LAYOUT HURALICHIKKANAHALLI CHIKKABANAVARA POST BENGALURU NORTH DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B O ANIL KUMAR., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001. 2. THE DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION VISHVESHWARAIAH TOWER. DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU-560001. Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:778 WP No. 21236 of 2024 3. THE COMMISSIONER CITY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL MADANAYAKANAHALLI BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT-560064 4. SMT. ROOPA Y M MAJOR IN AGE SENIOR HEALTH INSPECTOR CITY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL GOWRIBIDANUR CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-562101 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SPOORTHY HEGDE N , HCGP FOR R1 & R2: SRI RAVISHANKAR A, ADVOCATE FOR R3: SRI. D BOREGOWDA., ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM DATED: 31.07.2024 BEARING NO.NA.AA.EE.77 T.M.S 2024 (E) DATED: 31.07.2024 (ANNEXURE-A) PASSED BY R-1 IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO THE PETITIONER AND R-4 (AT SL.NOS. 2 AND 3) AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 07.01.2026 stating that in view of subsequent event, the writ petition does not survive - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:778 WP No. 21236 of 2024 for consideration and hence, the writ petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. 2. The memo is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE DM LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 48