15.10.26 4 Ct. No.10 AGM WPA 29846 of 2026 M/s Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Ms. Sruti Datta. ….for the petitioner Mr. Prithu Dudhoria. ….for the State-respondents 1. Notwithstanding due service of notice, State respondent remains unrepresented in Court today. 2. Mr. Prithu Dudhoria, learned advocate is engaged in this matter on behalf of the State. His appearance be accordingly regularized from the office of the Government Pleader along with the learned advocate who has been engaged in this matter from the office of the Govt. Pleader. 3. Affidavit of service filed in Court today be kept with the record. 4. The present writ petition has been filed challenging inter alia, the legality and validity of the adjudication order dated 09.12.2025 passed by the respondent No. 3. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits as follows; i. That a show cause notice in Form DRC 01 No. ZD1909250382741 dated 19.09.2025 has been issued to the petitioner demanding tax, interest and penalty. ii. The said notice has been uploaded on the GST portal under the tab ‘Additional Notice and 2 Orders’. Due to this, the petitioner did not get any actual intimation and hence could not respond to the show cause notice. iii. The petitioner came to know about the adjudication dated 09.23.2025 only after the accountant checked the common portal in the month of April 2026. iv. That the entire proceedings and the impugned order are contrary to law and have been passed in violation of principles of natural justice and without due compliance with the procedure prescribed under the said Act. 6. Learned counsel appearing for the State respondents opposed the writ petition and submitted since the petitioner has been granted ample opportunities to defend his case, the appeal has been rightly dismissed on limitation. 7. Having heard the parties and upon perusing the records made available this Court observes as follows; i. The petitioner has been able to make out a prima facie case. ii. The fact that show cause notice has been only uploaded under the ‘tab Additional Notice and Orders’ and no separate intimation has been given therefore, the petitioner has been unable to reply to the 3 same. This constitutes a violation of natural justice. 8. Considering the peculiar facts of the case, interference by this Court is warranted in ends of justice. 9. In view of the above this Court directs as follows: a. The adjudication order dated 09.12.2025, is hereby quashed and set aside. b. Petitioner shall file a reply to show cause notice dated 19.09.2025 within a period of two weeks from the date of communication of this order. c. Respondent no. 3 shall afford an opportunity of personal hearing and shall pass a fresh reasoned and speaking order of adjudication in accordance with law within 12 weeks from date. Such decision shall be communicated to the petitioner within a week thereafter. 10. With the above observations and directions this writ petition stands disposed of. 11. Since no affidavit in opposition has been called for, the allegations contained in the writ petition are deemed to have been denied and not admitted. 4 12. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order be supplied to the parties, if applied for, as early as possible. (Smita Das De, J.)