The Oriental Insurance Company Limited v. Deputy Commissioner ST
WP/25185/2026 · 2026-07-14
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 49141 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 49141 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 25185 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 14-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 25185 of 2026 and WMP.Nos.27454 & 27455 of 2026 The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Represented by its Authorized Signatory, Mr Pradeep Kumar A P V, No.4, 4, United India Life Building, Esplanade, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 108. ..Petitioner Vs
1. Deputy Commissioner (ST) Appeals Chennai North, PAPJM Main Building, 2nd Floor, Greams Road, Chennai-600 006.
2. Assistant Commissioner (ST) Loansquare Assessment Circle, Integrated Commercial Tax Building, No. 32, Elephant Gate Bridge Road, Chennai 600 003.
3. Assistant Commissioner (ST) Royapuram Assessment Circle, Integrated Commercial Tax Building, No. 32, Elephant Gate Bridge Road, Chennai 600 003. ..Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the Impugned Order-in-Appeal No. APG/390/2025 dated 12.01.2026 along with https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 25185 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 Summary order in Form APL-04 bearing Ref. No. ZD330226041258M dated 05.02.2026 passed by the 1st Respondent, and to quash the same. For Petitioner: Mr. Raghavan Ramabadran For Respondents: Ms. G. Dhana Madhri Government Counsel (Tax)
ORDER An appellate order dated 12.01.2026 rejecting the petitioner’s appeal for non-prosecution is challenged in this writ petition.
2. Adverting to the additional submissions made by the petitioner on 10.12.2025, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner attended one of the hearings and made these submissions. He adds that said
submissions and the appeal were not considered and disposed of on merits. 3.Ms.G.Dhana Madhri, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
4. The record shows that the appeal was lodged within the condonable period. The petitioner has also filed additional submissions and documents in support of the appeal. On perusal of the operative paragraphs of the impugned
order, it is clear that the merits of the appeal were not examined and that the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 25185 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 appeal was rejected solely on the ground of non-appearance. Therefore, the impugned order is unsustainable and is hereby set aside. As a consequence, the appeal is restored on the file of the appellate authority for consideration and disposal on merits after providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner. 5.The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 14-07-2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No KJ To
1. Deputy Commissioner (ST) Appeals Chennai North, PAPJM Main Building, 2nd Floor, Greams Road, Chennai-600 006.
2. Assistant Commissioner (ST) Loansquare Assessment Circle, Integrated Commercial Tax Building, No. 32, Elephant Gate Bridge Road, Chennai 600 003.
3. Assistant Commissioner (ST) Royapuram Assessment Circle, Integrated Commercial Tax Building, No. 32, Elephant Gate Bridge Road, Chennai 600 003. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 25185 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. KJ WP No. 25185 of 2026 and WMP.Nos.27454 & 27455 of 2026 14-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis