Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4912 (KAR)

SRI KRISHNAPPA v. MR ANJANAPPA

CRL.RP/1005/2019 · 2026-04-25

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23155 CRL.RP No. 1005 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.1005 OF 2019 (397(Cr.PC) / 438(BNSS) BETWEEN: SRI KRISHNAPPA S/O LATE RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS RETIRED AS ATTENDER IN SOIL SURVEY DEPARTMENT, GOVT OF INDIA, NO. 207, KODIGEHALLI, VIDYARANYAPURA POST, BENGALURU -560097 AND PRESENTLY R/AT NO. 52, 1ST MAIN, 2ND CROSS, BABAREDDY LAYOUT, R.T. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE 560 032 …PETITIONER (BY SRI MURTHY K, ADVOCATE) AND: MR ANJANAPPA S/O. LATE RAMAIAH, NO.15/1, 6TH CROSS, 1ST MAIN, SULTHANPALYA, R.T. NAGAR POST, BANGALORE – 560 032 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI P N RAMAKRISHNAPPA, ADVOCATE -ABSENT) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT, DATED 04.06.2019 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE LXIV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-65) AT BENGALURU IN Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23155 CRL.RP No. 1005 of 2019 CRL.A.NO.105/2016 AS NOT SUSTAINABLE AND CONSEQUENTLY, SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT, DATED 25.01.2016 PASSED BY THE LEARNED VII ADDITIONAL JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MACT-3 (SCH-3) AT BENGALURU IN C.C.NO.16074/2013 AS NOT SUSTAINABLE AND THEREBY, ACQUIT THE PETITIONER FROM THE ALLEGED OFFENCE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the respondent is present. 2. After addressing arguments for some time, learned counsel for the revision petitioner files a memo, which reads as under: “The petitioner/accused undertakes to pay the balance amount after deducting deposit amount as per Court Order in 3 months from May 2026. Hence, the same may be accepted and consider and dispose off the petition accordingly, in the ends of justice.” 3. Placing the memo on record, revision petition stands disposed of. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23155 CRL.RP No. 1005 of 2019 4. The amount in deposit is ordered to be withdrawn by the complainant under due identification. 5. It is made clear that, if any one of the installment as agreed in the memo is not paid, revision petitioner shall undergo imprisonment as ordered by the learned Trial Magistrate confirmed by the learned Judge in the First Appellate Court. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE kcm List No.: 2 Sl No.: 60