Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 49117 (KAR)

SRI. ASHOK. P. C. v. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER / DIVISION MANAGER

WP/19258/2022 · 2026-01-14

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2158 WP No. 19258 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 19258 OF 2022 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: SRI. ASHOK P.C. S/O. K. CHANDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT SITE NO. 26, MUNICIPAL KHATA NO.1432/243/27/1328, UPPARAHALLI EXTENSION, TUMKUR - 572 102. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VENKATESHA T.S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER / DIVISION MANAGER SVC CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., LEGAL AND RECOVERY OFFICE, OPP. MAKKALAKOOTA, BANGALORE - 560 018. 2. THE MANAGER SVC CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., HESSARAGHATTA BRANCH, TRIVENI MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL TRUST, Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2158 WP No. 19258 of 2022 28/29, HESSARGHATTA MAIN ROAD, MALLASANDRA, BANGALORE - 560 018. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SURYANARAYAN RAO M.S., ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ACTION INITIATED IN PURSUANCE TO DEMAND NOTICE DATE 23.12.2016 ANNEXURE-CAND CONSEQUENTLY QUASH THE ORDER DTD.15.2.2022 IN SA NO.351/2019 ON THE FILE OF DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-II KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE ANNEXURE-P AND THEREBY ALLOW SECURITIZATION APPEAL SA NO.351/2019 GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO RESTRAIN THE RESPONDENT FROM TAKING PHYSICAL POSSESSION OF SCHEDULE PROPERTY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:2158 WP No. 19258 of 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition stating that the matter has been settled out of Court and therefore, the petition has become infructuous. 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. All I.As. in this petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE SMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23