Research › Search › Judgment

Kerala High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 491 (KER)

Faisal Khan C P S/O Moideen Koya C P v. State of Kerala, Represented By Its Secretary,Department of Revenue

2026-02-09

P V Kunhikrishnan

body2026
JUDGMENT : P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J. 1. This Writ Petition (C) is filed seeking the following reliefs: " i) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ direction or order directing the 3 rd respondent to process Exhibit P2, the application in Form 6, within a specified time." [SIC] 2. The main prayer in this Writ Petition is to consider Ext.P2 Form - 6 application filed by the petitioner under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008 ('Act and Rules' in short). 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. 4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P2 within a time frame. Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner: 1. The 5 th respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext.P2 application to the 3 rd respondent/Authorised O period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. 2. The 3 rd respondent/Authorised O to consider the Ext.P2 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 5 th respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the report. I make it clear that the 3 rd respondent is free to pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law. 3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 3 rd and 5 th respondents for compliance.