Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 49070 (CAL)

IMRAN HOSEN BISWAS v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRM (A)/3564/2026 · 2026-10-14

Debangsu Basak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

14.10.2026 DL-11 Court No.37 [Bench ID-265691] (AD) (Allowed) In the High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side C.R.M. (A) 3564 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Nowda Police Station Case No.460 of 2026 dated 15.09.2026 under Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending before the Ld. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Berhampore, Murshidabad. GR (A) 4625/26. And In the matter of: Imran Hosen Biswas ….petitioner Mr. Kazi M. Rahman, Advocate …for the petitioner Mr. Koustav Some, Advocate Mr. Koustav Lal Mukherjee, Advocate … for the State 1. Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail. 2. Two adults entered into a consensual relationship. 3. Apparently, there was a physical relationship between the parties. 4. As to whether, the relationship was entered into on the promises as claimed by the petitioner or not may be decided at the trial. 5. In such circumstances, I grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha 2 Sanhita, 2023 and on condition that the petitioner will report before the Investigating Officer once a month till the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court. 7. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. 8. C.R.M. (A) 3564 of 2026 is disposed of. (Debangsu Basak, J.) ABHIJIT DAS Digitally signed by ABHIJIT DAS Date: 2026.10.14 15:33:03 +05'30'