Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 49057 (CAL)

KAJAL GHORAI AND ANR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/18172/2026 · 2026-10-14

Amrita Sinha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

14-10-2026 Item No.5 Subrata Bhattacharyya AR(C) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side Case No. WPA No.18172 of 2026 In the matter of: Kajal Ghorai & Anr. …. petitioners VS. The State of West Bengal & Ors. For the Petitioners: Mr. Sudipta Dasgupta Mr. Saikat Sutradhar ….advocates For the State: Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee ….advocate For the Mission Director: Md. Sarwar Jahan Ms. Mousumi Mitra Ms. Tapati Sarkar ….advocates 1. The petitioners were initially serving as Sahayak/Sahayika in Shishu Shiksha Kendra. They exercised option to avail the benefit given in favour of Para Teachers. 2. The benefit of Para Teacher to be given to the Sahayak/Sahayika was, on publication of the notification, found to be not beneficial. The petitioners, accordingly, intend to be reverted back to the status of Sahayak/Sahayika and they intend to remain in service till 65 years of age. 3. Various writ petitions on similar facts were considered by the Court and the Court by judgment dated 27th September, 2024 passed in WPA 24808 of 2024 (Antara Pandit & Ors –Vs- The State of West Bengal & Ors.) directed the concerned State authorities including PBRSSM authorities to treat the petitioners as Sahayak/Sahayika and the option submitted by them to be treated as Para Teacher has been directed to be treated as cancelled. Page 2 4. As the facts of the case are similar to the case of Antara Pandit (supra), accordingly, in line with the above judgment, the instant writ petition is disposed of by directing the Mission Director to consider the case of the petitioners for being treated as Sahayak/Sahayika and permit them to remain in service till 65 years of age. 5. No benefit in respect of para-teacher will be allowed in their favour. 6. The writ petition stands disposed of. 7. The receipt showing payment of deficit court fees filed in Court be taken on record. 8. Parties to act on the basis of the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. 9. Certified server copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Amrita Sinha, J.)