Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5676-DB MFA No. 6323 of 2018 C/W MFA No. 6264 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6323 OF 2018 (FC) C/W MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6264 OF 2018 (FC)
BETWEEN:
SHIVALINGA, S/O LATE DODDAHONNEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT NO.669, 5TH CROSS, DR.RAJKUMAR ROAD, YERAGANAHALLI EXTENSION, MYSORE CITY, MYSORE-570 011. …APPELLANT (COMMON) (BY SRI.U.PANDURANGA NAYAK, ADVOCATE AND SRI.H.M.MANJUNATH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
MAMATHA, W/O SHIVALINGA, D/O MANJUNATHA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT NO.1019, NEETHI MARGA, 15TH MAIN, II STAGE, SIDDARTHANAGAR MYSORE-570 011, PRESENTLY R/AT MRAC, MYSORE CHAMARAJANAGAR, DISTRICT CO.OP MILK PRODUCERS CO.OP SOCIETY UNION, MALEMAHADESHWARA ROAD, SIDDARTHANAGAR POST, MYSORE – 570 011. …RESPONDENT (COMMON) (BY SRI PRABHAKARA, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by K G RENUKAMBA Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:5676-DB MFA No. 6323 of 2018 C/W MFA No. 6264 of 2018
M.F.A.No.6323/2018 IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF FAMILY COURTS ACT, 1984 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 31.05.2018 PASSED IN MC.NO.650/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, MYSURU, DISMISSING THE PETITION FILED U/S 9 OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT.
M.F.A.No.6264/2018 IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF FAMILY COURTS ACT, 1984, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 31.05.2018 PASSED IN M.C.NO.423/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, MYSURU, ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 13(1)(ia) OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT.
THESE MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEALS COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI)
Sri U.Panduranga Nayak, learned Counsel for the appellant states that he has no instructions in these appeals. The appeals are therefore dismissed.
Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE KSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18