Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1406 RPFC No. 161 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 161 OF 2024 BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. SHEWTHA W/O SANTHOSH DATHATHREYA MANAKAME D/O MANOHAR BHASKARA BHAT AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
2.
KUM JAHANAVI SANTHOSH MANAKAME D/O SANTHOSH DATHATHREYA MANAKAME, AGED ABOUT 11 YEARS
3.
KUM. JAYAS SANTHOSH MANAKAME D/O SANTHOSH DATHATHREYA MANAKAME AGED ABOUT 05 YEARS PETITIONER NO.2 AND 3 BEING MINORS REPRESENTED THROUGH THEIR GUARDIAN NATURAL MOTHER PETITIONER NO.1 SMT. SHWETHA AS NEXT FRIEND - NATURAL GUARDIAN ALL ARE R/AT NO. 849, 11TH CROSS K.B. EXTENSION, DAVANAGERE - 577 002. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. V.B. SIDDARAMAIAH, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by AASEEFA PARVEEN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1406 RPFC No. 161 of 2024 AND:
SRI. SANTHOSH DATHATHREYA MANAKAME S/O DATHATHREYA MANAKAME AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS OCC: OWNER OF CHAMUNDESHWARI GOLD JEWELLARY SHOP AND AGRCULTURIST, R/O NO. 119/1, CHANDRASHEKHARAIAH NILAY JOGA BHAT, HONNAVARA UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT - 581 334. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. RAJU C.N, ADVOCATE)
THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SEC.19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 15.04.2024 PASSED IN CRL. MISC NO.168/2022 ON THE FILE OF FAMILY COURT, DAVANAGERE., PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SEC.125 OF Cr.P.C., FOR MAINTENANCE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1406 RPFC No. 161 of 2024 ORAL ORDER
Sri. V.B.Siddaramaiah, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners filed this revision petition aggrieved by the amount that was awarded as maintenance.
2. Learned counsel contends that the maintenance case was filed in the year 2022 and was disposed of in the year 2024. In the light of escalation of prices, needs and requirements of the petitioners, the petitioners now intend to move an application before the Trial Court seeking enhancement of maintenance. By submitting thus, learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw the revision petition.
3. Permission as prayed for is accorded.
4. Revision petition is thereby dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35