- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1158 MFA No. 5025 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 5025 OF 2025 (AA) BETWEEN: NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, PIU-MANGALORE, DOOR NO.3-29, BETHEL, THARETHOTA, NEAR PUMPWELL (NH-66), MANGALORE-575005. REPRESENTED BY ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SHOBHITH N.SHETTY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. K.MOHAMMAD (SINCE DECEASED) MRS. ZOHARA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, W/O. LATE K.MOHAMMAD, R/AT G-2-154/4, GOLDEN MANSION, NEAR GEM PUBLIC SCHOOL, KALLADKA, BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.DISTRICT. 2. MRS. MARIYAM UMAINA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, D/O. LATE K.MOHAMMAD, W/O. SHEIK ALI, R/AT 20-250, YUSUF COMPOUND, BOLANGADI HOUSE, PANEMANGALORE, KALLADKA, BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.DISTRICT. Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1158 MFA No. 5025 of 2025 3. MRS. FORHANA MOHAMMAD, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, D/O. LATE K MOHAMMAD, W/O. MOHAMMAD ASHRAF KOTEKAR, R/AT NO.G-1-114(3), K.C.ROAD, KALLADKA, GOILTHAMAJALU, BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.DISTRICT. 4. MRS. NOUREENA MOHAMMAD, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, D/O. LATE K.MOHAMMAD, W/O. NAUSHAD D.H., R/AT 1-72(5), MANGALANAGARA HOUSE, NEAR JAMIA MASJIDUNOOR, MANJANADY, ASSAIGOLI, D.K.DISTRICT. 5. MR. NIHAN MOHAMMAD, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, S/O. LATE K.MOHAMMAD, R/AT G-2-154/3, GOLDEN MANSION, NEAR GEM PUBLIC SCHOOL, PATTEKODI-KALLADKA, GOLTHAMAJALU VILLAGE, BANTWAL TALUK, D.K.DISTRICT. 6. THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, (N.H.A.I), N.H-75, HASSAN-B.C ROAD SECTION, NO.HIG-64, DTDC COURIER OFFICE BUILDING, 1ST FLOOR, KHB COLONY, CHANNAPATTANA, OPP. KSRTC NEW BUS STAND, HASSAN-573201. 7. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND ARBITRATOR, DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT, MANGALURU-575008. …RESPONDENTS THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 37(1)(C) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:1158 MFA No. 5025 of 2025 THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED AS UNDER: ORAL JUDGMENT Sri.Shobhith N.Shetty, counsel for the appellant appeared in person and submits that a memo has been filed stating that the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn. 2. When queried, counsel submits that a conscious decision is taken about the dismissal of the petition as withdrawn. 3. Submission is noted. Memo is placed on record. 4. Resultantly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3