Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 49026 (KAR)

SRI P G SURESH v. SMT JAYALAKSHMAMMA

RSA/1160/2024 · 2026-01-06

Ravi V Hosmani

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:505 RSA No. 1160 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1160 OF 2024 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: SRI P G SURESH, S/O GUNDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT NO 3362/1, 9TH 'C' ROSS, KASTHURI ROAD NEAR SHANIMAHATHMA TEMPLE, PIPELINE ROAD, MALLASANDRA, T DASARAHALLI, BENGALURU - 560 057. …APPELLANT (BY SRI SANCHAN JAI NANDAN, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT JAYALAKSHMAMMA, W/O LATE GOOLIGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, 2. SRI PRAKASH, S/O LATE GOOLIGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS 3. SRI DEEPAK, S/O LATE GOOLIGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, 4. SMT BHAGYALAKSHMI, D/O LATE GOOLIGOWDA, W/O SIDDARAJU SINCE DECEASED REP BY HIS LRS Digitally signed by GEETHAKUMARI PARLATTAYA S Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:505 RSA No. 1160 of 2024 4(a) SIDDARAJU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN 4(b) GOWTHAMI, D/O LATE BHAGYALAKSHMI AND SIDDARAJU, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, 4(c) PRIYANKA, D/O LATE BHAGYALAKSHMI AND SIDDARAJU, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS, R/AT NO 489, 1ST FLOOR, ATHMEEYA GELEYARA BALAGA ROAD, 6TH CROSS, 12TH MAIN, HESARAGHATTA, BENGALURU - 560 088. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SIDDAMALLAPPA P M., ADVOCATE) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.04.2024 PASSED IN RA.NO.17/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNIGAL, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.01.2018 PASSED IN O.S.NO.100/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNIGAL. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:505 RSA No. 1160 of 2024 ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for appellant has filed a memo dated 08.12.2025 stating that appellant has instructed him to withdraw appeal. 2. Memo is taken on record. 3. In view of memo, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE Psg* List No.: 2 Sl No.: 146