- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3714 RSA No. 2461 of 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 2461 OF 2008 (DEC) BETWEEN: S.G.JAYARAM S/O G.R.GIDDE GOWDA (LATE) AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS SALUMARA VILLAGE, GONIBEEDU HOBLI & POST, MUDIGERE TALUK, CHIKMAGALUR-577132. …APPELLANT (ABSENT) AND: 1. G.M.PUTTE GOWDA S/O MULLE GOWDA (LATE) AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS 2. NAGAMMA W/O. G.R.GIDDE GOWDA (LATE) AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, 3. S.G.INDRESH S/O. G.R.GIDDE GOWDA (LATE) AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, 4. S.G.MOHANA S/O. G.R.GIDDE GOWDA (LATE) AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING IN SALUMARA VILLAGE, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3714 RSA No. 2461 of 2008 GONIBEEDU HOBLI & POST, MUDIGERE TALUK, CHIKMAGALUR-577132. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. JAYAKUMAR S.PATIL & ASSTS. ADVOCATE FOR R1; VIDE ORDER DATED 05.06.2025, R1 DISMISSED AS ABATED, SRI. RAGHAVENDRA K., ADVOCATE FOR R4; R3 SERVED) THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908. THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS LISTED FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER The appeal is listed today for orders and the name of the appellant is printed/ shown in the cause list. The name of the appellant is called out thrice in the open Court, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, either personally or through video conferencing. The appellant is absent. 2. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 20.07.2023, on that day, counsel Sri.P.Mahesh., was permitted to retire from the case and the registry was directed to print the name of the appellant in the cause list. Accordingly, the appeal is listed today by printing the name of the appellant in the cause list. As could be seen from - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:3714 RSA No. 2461 of 2008 the appeal papers, the appeal is filed in 2008. Now we are in 2026. The appeal is pending from eighteen years. As already noted above, the name of the appellant is called out thrice in the open Court, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, either personally or through video conferencing. The appellant has not engaged counsel to represent him in the Court. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. 3. Because of dismissal of the appeal, interim order if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE PSJ List No.: 3 Sl No.: 18