INDU DEVI SARMA AND ANR v. GAJENDRA NATH SARMA AND ANR
FAO/63/2025 · 2026-02-25
Mridul Kumar Kalita
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4901 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4901 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010219092025
2026:GAU-AS:3031
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : FAO/63/2025 INDU DEVI SARMA AND ANR W/O LATE CHANDRA NATH SARMA 2: JITENDRA NATH SARM SON OF LATE CHANDRA NATH SARMA BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF APARTMENT NO. 401 RIANSHI WOOD APARTMENT LAKHIMI PATH HATIGAON DISPUR GUWAHATI PIN- 781038 DISTRICT- KAMRUP M ASSAM AND HEREIN REPRESENTED BY THE ATTORNEY HOLDER NAMELY SUBIMAL CHAKRABO VERSUS GAJENDRA NATH SARMA AND ANR SON OF LATE BHAVA NATH SARMA 2:MANASH PRATIM SARMA SON OF SRI GAJENDRA NATH SARMA BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF NEAR PADUM BHAWAN DURGA SAROVAR KAMAKHYA GATE GUWAHATI PIN- 781010 DISTRICT- KAMRUP M ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S CHAMARIA, MR. N M DEKA,MR M M ZAMAN,MR A N SARMAH
Page No.# 2/2 Advocate for the Respondent : MR P K KALITA (R-1,2), R SARMA (R-1,2),MR. K R BOROOAH (R-1,2)
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA
ORDER Date : 26.02.2026
1. Heard Mr. S. Chamaria, learned counsel for the appellants. Also heard Mr. K. R. Borooah, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
2.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the land grabbing case filed by the present appellant before the Trial Court has already been dismissed by the Trial Court at the admission stage by its order dated 26.02.2026, i.e., today. Hence, he submits that this appeal has become infructuous and, therefore, prays for allowing him to withdraw the same.
3. The prayer is allowed.
4. This Appeal is dismissed on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant