Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 49001 (KAR)

SMT. R LAKSHMI v. CAN FIN HOMES LIMITED

WP/20506/2024 · 2026-01-06

Ashok S Kinagi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:669 WP No. 20506 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 20506 OF 2024 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. R LAKSHMI W/O. LATE RAMAKRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.28/3, 17TH CROSS, 4TH BLOCK, 1ST STAGE, PEENYA, BENGALURU - 560 058. 2. SRI. R.NAGARAJU, S/O. LATE RAMAKRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.28/3, 17TH CROSS, 4TH BLOCK, 1ST STAGE, PEENYA, BENGALURU - 560 058. 3. SRI. CHANDRU, S/O. LATE RAMAKRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.28/3, 17TH CROSS, Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:669 WP No. 20506 of 2024 4TH BLOCK, 1ST STAGE, PEENYA, BENGALURU - 560 058. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. JAGADISH J R., ADVOCATE) AND: CAN FIN HOMES LIMITED NON BANKING FINANCE COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 1956 REGULATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE NATIONAL HOUSING BANK ACT, 1987 HAVING BRANCH OFFICE AT SRI ANNAPURNESHWARI COMPLEX, 1ST FLOOR, B.G.S. ROAD, BIDADI - 562109. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER SHIV V.R. THROUGH D. NARAANA SWAMY …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. MANJUNATH C., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD. 28.05.2024 PASSED IN CRL. MISC.3147/2024 BY THE 31ST A.C.M.M AT BENGALURU WHICH IS PRODUCED AS ANNX-A. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:669 WP No. 20506 of 2024 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner filed a memo for withdrawal of the writ petition. It is stated that the respondents have been repaying the loan in terms of the agreement, and in view of the same, the petitioner prays the court to permit the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Memo is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE SKS CT:KHV