HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 9310 of 2026 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. There are certain discrepancies in the writ petition, therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh. In such view of the fact, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition. March 19, 2026 Sattyarth Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ambuj Kumar Mishra, Vineet Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shyam Mani Shukla (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Manu Deep Sharma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Other .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad