XENIXT UDYOG LIMITED AND ORS v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
WPA/26664/2026 · 2026-10-14
Krishna Rao
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 48993 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 48993 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S/L 24
14.10.2026 Court. No. 25
suvayan WPA 26664 of 2026
Xenixt Udyog Limited & Ors. Vs. The Union of India & Ors. Mr. Biswaroop Bhattacharya
Mr. Anindya Bose
Mr. Golam Mohiuddin
Mr. Raina Das
Mr. Md. Kaif Hossain …for the petitioners. Mr. Sukanta Ghosh
…for U.O.I.
Mr. Uday Sharma
Mr. Debabrata Das
Mr. A. Sarkar
Mr. Pratik Acharjee …for R.B.I.
Mr. Arnab Basu Mullick …for the respondent nos. 3 & 4. Mr. Bikash Chandra Das
Mr. Surajit Singh …for the State. 1. The petitioners have filed the present writ application praying for a direction upon the bank namely, IndusInd Bank, Belur Branch to defreeze the account of the petitioner and to allow the petitioner to operate the bank account. 2. The petitioners submit that since the year 2024, the bank has freezed the account of the petitioners and since then the bank is neither allowing the petitioner to operate the bank account nor the bank has defrezzed the account of the petitioner. The petitioners have made several requests to the bank authority but the bank has not considered the request of the petitioners. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the bank has submitted report and submits that the bank has received nine reports from the NCRP with regard to the fraudulent
2 transactions in the account of the petitioners and on the basis of the instruction of the NCRP, the bank has freezed the account of the petitioners. In the report the bank has submitted that the total disputed amount is Rs. 17,067/-. He further submits that after the month of February, 2025 neither the investigating agency has made any communication nor any further complaint has been received against the petitioners. 4. Considering the above, this Court finds that since the year 2024 the account of the petitioners is being freezed and last complaint has been made only on February, 2025 thereafter neither the investigating agency or Cyber Crime authority have made any correspondence with the bank. The bank has freezed the account of the petitioner only on the instruction of the NCRP and at present the disputed amount is only Rs. 17,067/-. 5. In view of the above, the bank is directed to defreeze the account of the petitioners and to allow the petitioners to operate the bank account by keeping the disputed amount of Rs. 17,067/- in lien. 6. WPA 26664 of 2026 is disposed of. 7.
Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all the necessary formalities. (Krishna Rao, J.)