Crl.O.P.No.18266 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 15.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Crl.O.P.No.18266 of 2026 G.Ramprasath ... Petitioner(s) Vs. The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Hosur Town Police Station, Hosur, Krishnagiri District. ... Respondent(s) Crime No.493 of 2025 PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail concerned in Crime No.493 of 2025 pending on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s) : Mr.C.Samivel For Respondent(s) : Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 08.05.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 140(1), 103(1), 191(2), 191(3), 61(2) and 238 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in Crime No.493 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.18266 of 2026 2. It is the case of the prosecution that, due to previous enmity, the co-accused attacked the deceased, caused his death, and dumped his body in a river in Andhra Pradesh. It is further alleged that, based on the confession of the co-accused, the petitioner herein has been arrayed as an accused. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner has been in custody since 08.05.2026 and is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. It is the specific submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner, being only a driver, has no specific overt act attributed to him and that the co-accused have already been enlarged on bail, which fact was not seriously disputed by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side). Hence, he prayed for the grant of bail on the ground of parity. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent, while opposing the grant of bail to the petitioner, reiterated the prosecution case and, on instructions, submitted that the petitioner, though a driver, had actively participated in the commission of the offence. However, he 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.18266 of 2026 fairly submitted that the investigation has already been completed, the charge sheet has also been filed, and that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents. 5. Considering the totality of the circumstances, the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, the fact that the petitioner has no bad antecedents, the fact that the investigation has already been completed and the charge sheet has been filed, and also the fact that the co-accused have already been enlarged on bail, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail, subject to certain conditions. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Hosur and subject to the following conditions: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m. until further orders; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.18266 of 2026 [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] on breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions had been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court itself, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [f] if the petitioner thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR may be registered under Section 269 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 15.07.2026 skr Note: 1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court. 2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.18266 of 2026 To 1. The learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Hosur 2. The Superintendent, District Jail, Dharmapuri 3. The Inspector of Police, Hosur Town Police Station, Hosur, Krishnagiri 4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.18266 of 2026 C.KUMARAPPAN,J. skr Crl.O.P.No.18266 of 2026 15.07.2026 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis