Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48981 (CAL)

SAHANURSARDAR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/25526/2026 · 2026-10-13

Supratim Bhattacharya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 1 13.10.2026 Item No.240 Court No.21 MKP WPA/25526/2026 SAHANUR SARDAR VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. Mr. Arka Ranjan Bhattacharya, Mr. Swarup Ranjan Kar, Mr. Mizanur Rahaman. …….… for the Petitioner Mr. Mukunda Lal Sarkar …….for the State Mrs. Anamika Pandey. ……for the E.C.I 1. The petitioner has the EPIC No.YGV0816843. 2. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition seeking an appropriate order be passed so that conscionable justice may be done and now the Learned advocate representing the petitioner seeks direction as to the fact that the appeal preferred before the Tribunal be disposed of at the earliest. 3. Heard the learned advocate and on perusal of the record and considering the submission of the Learned advocate, it transpires that the petitioner has sought for early disposal of his grievance. 4. This Court has not gone into the merit of the case. 5. In view of the aforementioned discussion, the Appellate Tribunal is requested to consider and dispose of the appeal preferred by the petitioner as 2 2 early as possible, preferably within a period of three (3) months from the date of communication of this order to the Tribunal. 6. WPA 25526 of 2026 is disposed of. 7. Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on priority basis upon compliance of all formalities. (Supratim Bhattacharya, J.)