Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48979 (MAD)

Jonathan Kingston Lloyd v. The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/16516/2026 · 2026-07-06

D Bharatha Chakravarthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 16516 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRL OP No. 16516 of 2026 Jonathan Kingston Lloyd, S/o Susil Kumar, No.8, D.405, Nextera Apartment, Nethaji Nagar Main Road, Perumbakkam, Chennai. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police Perumbakkam Police Station, Chennai. Crime No.246 of 2025 2. S.Sweetlin Rani W/o Lawrence Kumar, Plot NO.76, 4th Street, Maruthi Nagar, Madambakkam, Kancheepuram. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, praying to call for the records relating to the case in CC.No.414 of 2026 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.2, Alandhur and Quash the same and pass such further or other orders. For Petitioner(s): Mr.T.Jeyam For Respondent(s): Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 16516 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 Order 1. This Criminal Original Petition seeks to quash the C.C.No.414 of 2026, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.2, Alandhur, for alleged offences under Sections 296(b), 132, 355, 351(2) of BNSS Act, 2023, on the ground of compromise between the parties. The parties are present before the court and, on examination, stand by their compromise and do not want the case to proceed further. 2. The broad contours of the High Court's power to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Cr.p.c. and Section 528 of the BNSS in respect of compromise of non-compoundable offences are laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Gian Singh -Vs- State of Punjab and Another (2012 10 SCC 303) and other subsequent judgments. 3. The gist of facts leading to the instant case are that the petitioner had parked his car in the school ground. When the petitioner was asked to come out, he was found to be in an inebriated condition; as such, the complaint was given. The Headmaster of the school would submit that https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 16516 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 she is otherwise busy with her work and that she does not want to pursue the case. 4. Thus, it can be seen that this matter is a fit case for the exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction to quash the case on compromise. 5. Accordingly, this Crl.O.P. No.16516 of 2026 stands allowed. The C.C.No.414 of 2026, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.2, Alandhur stands quashed. 06-07-2026 Neutral Citation: No AH To 1.The Inspector of Police Perumbakkam Police Station, Chennai. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 16516 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY J. AH CRL OP No. 16516 of 2026 06-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis