CRL OP No. 17801 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRL OP No. 17801 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.Nos. 11891 & 11892 of 2026 1. Narayanasamy S/o.Seenappa, D.No.1/247, Chokkanathapuram Village, Nallur Post, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 2. Muniraju S/o.Venkatesh, D.No.1/103, Moranapalli Village, Perandapalli Post, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 3. Madesh S/o.Kembaraj, D.No.2/169A, A.Samanapalli Village, Perandapalli Post, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 4. Ravi S/o.Krishnappa, D.No.2/324, Bathalapalli Village, Moranapalli Post, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 5. Sankarappa @ Sankar S/o.Chithappa, D.No.1/128, Moranappalli Village, Kumudepalli Post, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17801 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 6 6. Kiran S/o.Radhakrishna, D.No.144, Ambedkar Colony, Bidaraguppe Village, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore District, Karnataka State. 7. Abilash S/o.Gangappa, D.No.35, 1st Main Road, Vibuthipura, Bangalore North, Karnataka State. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State represented by,The Inspector of Police, Bagalur Police Station, Krishnagiri District. Crime No.154 of 2024 2. Harish S/o.Muniellappa, D.No.3/114, Echangoor Village, Bagalur Post, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Criminal Original Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, to call for the records relating C.C.No.04 of 2025 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Hosur and quash the same by allowing this Criminal Original Petition and pass such other orders as this Honorable Court may deem fits and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.J.Pradeep For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Rajasekaran Government Counsel (Crl. Side) for R1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17801 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 6 ORDER This Criminal Original Petition seeks to quash C.C.No. 04 of 2025 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Hosur for alleged offences under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324 & 506(ii) of IPC, on the ground of compromise between the parties. The parties are present before the court and, on examination, stand by their compromise and do not want the case to proceed further. 2. The broad contours of the High Court's power to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Cr.p.c. and Section 528 of the BNSS in respect of compromise of non-compoundable offences are laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Gian Singh -Vs- State of Punjab and Another (2012 10 SCC 303) and other subsequent judgments. 3. The gist of facts leading to the instant case are that on account of the land dispute, the accused are said to have attacked the de facto complainant and the victims with Aruva and other weapons causing grievous injuries. It is now stated that the issue has since been resolved. 4. Thus, it can be seen that this matter is a fit case for the exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction to quash the case on compromise. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17801 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 6 5. Accordingly, this Crl.O.P. No. 17801 of 2026 stands allowed. The C.C.No.04 of 2025 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Hosur stands quashed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 09-07-2026 Neutral Citation: No KKN https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17801 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 6 To 1. The Inspector of Police, Bagalur Police Station, Krishnagiri District. 2. The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Hosur. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 17801 of 2026 __________ Page6 of 6 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. KKN CRL OP No. 17801 of 2026 09-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis