Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48968 (MAD)

N.MUTHUSAMY v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/25852/2026 · 2026-07-06

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 25852 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 25852 of 2026 N.Muthusamy S/o.Late Nallasamy Gounder, Thamarapalayam, Erode- 638 152. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Erode- 638 011. Erode District. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer Erode- 638 011. Erode District. 3. The Tahsildar Kodumudi, Kodumudi Taluk, Erode District-638 151. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to issue Ayan Patta to the petitioner for the house situated in Natham Survey No.913/ 27, 30 in Itchipalayam-A Village, Kodumudi Taluk, Erode District based on the representation of the petitioner dated 03.10.2025. __________ Page1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 25852 of 2026 For Petitioner(s): Mr. Palanikumar N For Respondent(s): Mr. B. Pachaiyappan Government Counsel ORDER The present Writ Petition has been filed seeking the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 03.10.2025. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had submitted a representation dated 03.10.2025, requesting the second respondent to issue an Ayan Patta for the house situated in Natham Survey No. 913/27, 30 in Itchipalayam-A Village, Kodumudi Taluk, Erode District. He further submitted that the said representation has not been considered till date, and challenging this inaction, the petitioner has approached this Court. 3. The learned Government Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the third respondent has already forwarded a report to the second respondent / Revenue Divisional Officer, who is the competent authority to pass appropriate orders on the petitioner’s representation. __________ Page2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 25852 of 2026 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made on either side, this Court, without going into the merits of the matter, directs the second respondent / Revenue Divisional Officer to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 03.10.2025 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law. This exercise shall be completed within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. With the above direction, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 06-07-2026 Asi To 1. The District Collector Erode- 638 011, Erode District. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer Erode- 638 011, Erode District. 3. The Tahsildar Kodumudi, Kodumudi Taluk, Erode District-638 151. __________ Page3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 25852 of 2026 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. Asi WP No. 25852 of 2026 06-07-2026 __________ Page4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis