Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48958 (KAR)

SRI NINGE GOWDA v. LATE SRI MAHESHWARA ACHAAR

RSA/1177/2024 · 2026-01-06

Ravi V Hosmani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:869 RSA No. 1177 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1177 OF 2024 (INJ) BETWEEN: SRI NINGE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS S/O LATE SRI KAPINI GOWDA YALAHANKA VILLAGE HALEBEEDU HOBLI BELUR TALUK HASSAN-573 115 …APPELLANT (BY SRI SHARATHKUMAR SHETTY, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. LATE SRI MAHESHWARA ACHAAR S/O LATE RUDRACHAAR SINCE DEAD BY HSI LRS SMT. PUTTAGOWRAMMA W/O LATE MAHESHWARACHAR AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS 2. SMT. DHANYAKUMARI D/O LATE MAHESHWARACHAR AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 3. SRI YOGESHA S/O LATE MAHESHWARACHAR AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS 4. SMT. SUJATHA H M S/O LATE MAHESHWARACHAR AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS 5. SRI RAMESHA H M S/O LATE MAHESHWARACHAR Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:869 RSA No. 1177 of 2024 AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS RESPONDENT NO.1(A TO E) R/AT YELAHANKA VILLAGE HALEBEEDU HOBLI BELUR TALUK HASSAN-573 115 …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 06.01.2023 PASSED IN RA NO.39/2017 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BELUR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 04.09.2017 PASSED IN OS NO.17/2012 ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE, BELUR. THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL JUDGMENT This matter is listed for orders on non-compliance of office objections for VI time. Despite sufficient opportunity having been granted for compliance earlier, appellant was directed to comply with office objections till closure of Court hours. However, there is no representation and office objections remained un-complied. This would indicate that appellant is not diligently pursuing appeal. Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE AV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 141