Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48955 (MAD)

G.Saravanakumar v. The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/18503/2026 · 2026-07-15

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.18503 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 15.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Crl.O.P.No.18503 of 2026 G.Saravanakumar ... Petitioner(s) Vs. The State rep. by the Inspector of Police, Dhali Police Station, Tirupur District. ... Respondent(s) Crime No.104 of 2026 PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail concerned in Crime No.104 of 2026 pending on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s) : Mr.G.Gokul For Respondent(s) : Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For Intervenor(s) : Mr.Dani Jeshwanth ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 18.05.2026 for the alleged offences under Section 326(g) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in Crime No.104 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.18503 of 2026 2. It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioner set fire to the house of the defacto complainant, who is his wife. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner has been in custody since 18.05.2026 and is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for the grant of bail. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent, while opposing the grant of bail to the petitioner, reiterated the prosecution case and, on instructions, submitted that a major portion of the investigation has already been completed and that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents. 5. The learned counsel for the intervenor reiterated the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) and did not seriously oppose the grant of bail to the petitioner. 6. Considering the totality of the circumstances, the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, the fact that the petitioner has no bad 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.18503 of 2026 antecedents, the fact that the learned counsel for the intervenor has not seriously opposed the grant of bail, and also the fact that a major portion of the investigation has already been completed, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail, subject to certain conditions. 7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Udumalpet, and subject to the following conditions: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] on breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.18503 of 2026 law as if the conditions had been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court itself, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [f] if the petitioner thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR may be registered under Section 269 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 15.07.2026 skr Note: 1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court. 2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.18503 of 2026 To 1. The learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Udumalpet, 2. The Superintendent, Sub Jail, Udumalpet 3. The Inspector of Police, Dhali Police Station, Tirupur District. 4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.18503 of 2026 C.KUMARAPPAN,J. skr Crl.O.P.No.18503 of 2026 15.07.2026 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis