Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 48952 (KAR)

SRI. JAYASHANKAR v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/9095/2022 · 2026-01-05

M G Uma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:183 CRL.P No. 9095 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9095 OF 2022 BETWEEN: SRI. JAYASHANKAR S/O NANJUNDAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT NO.18, 2ND FLOOR FLAT NO.2B, 1ST CROSS PRANAV APARTMENT, R.M.V. EXTENSION SADASHIVANAGAR BANGALORE - 560 080 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MAHESH R.D., ADVOCATE (AB)) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA MADIWALA POLICE STATION, BANGALORE - 560 068 REPRESENTED BY LEARNED STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HCK, BANGALORE-01 2. SMT. SUSHEELA K.S., W/O NITISH, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT NO.101/1, 13TH A CROSS 6TH A MAIN, J.C. NAGAR, KURUBARAHALLI, BANGALORE - 560 086 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RANGASWAMY .R., HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS PENDING ON THE SPL.C.C.NO.1141/2019 ON THE Digitally signed by PRASHANTH N V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:183 CRL.P No. 9095 of 2022 FILE OF THE HONBLE XXXII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPECIAL JUDGE FOR CBI CASES AT BENGALURU (CCH- 34) FOR THE OFFENCE U/S.403, 406, 409, 417, 419, 420, 120-B R/W SEC.34 OF IPC AND U/S.9 OF KPIDFE ACT 2004 WHICH IS ARISING OUT OF CR.NO.80/2017 OF MADIWALA POLICE STATION BENGALURU. THIS CRL.P, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M G UMA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent, even when the matter was passed over twice and again called at 3:30 p.m. The petition is of the year 2022. It is listed for fourth time for compliance of office objections. The order sheet dated 28.10.2024 reads as under: "Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. There is no representation. The petition is of the year 2022. The matter is listed for third time for compliance of office objections. Inspite of that the office objections are not complied with. I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter. However, to afford a final opportunity, a week's time is granted to comply with the office objections. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:183 CRL.P No. 9095 of 2022 List this matter after one week." In-spite of that, there is no progress in the matter. Learned HCGP has filed a memo dated 05.01.2026 stating that the petitioner had filed W.P.No.9124/2025 before this Court and the same came to be allowed vide order dated 17.04.2025. Memo is placed on record. Petition is dismissed. SD/- (M G UMA) JUDGE MKM CT:VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2