Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4895 (UTT)

SHAGUN AGARWAL v. VINOD CHANDRA RAWAT

C528/303/2026 · 2026-02-26

Alok Mahra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS C-528 No. 303 of 2026 Hon ’ble Alok Mah r a, J. Mr. Tushar Prajapati, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. The present Criminal Misc. Application under Section 528 of BNSS has been filed by the applicant challenging the summoning order dated 21.12.2021 as well as the entire proceedings of Criminal Complaint Case No. 7020 of 2021, Vinod Chandra Rawat Vs. Shagun Agarwal, under Section 138 of N.I. Act, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dehradun, District Dehradun. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the learned Judicial Magistrate, without application of mind, has passed the summoning order dated 21.12.2021. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 5. Perusal of the impugned summoning order dated 21.12.2021 reveals that the evidence collected was placed before the learned court below, which, after applying its judicial mind, has rightly summoned the applicant to face trial under Section 138 of N.I. Act. 6. The court concerned has considered & discussed all relevant aspects. Thus, the view taken by the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned cannot be faulted. This Court does not find any infirmity or illegality in the impugned summoning order dated 21.12.2021 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Dehradun in Criminal Complaint Case No. 7020 of 2021, Vinod Chandra Rawat Vs. Shagun Agarwal, under Section 138 of N.I. Act. Hence, this Court does not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order. 7. Accordingly, the criminal misc. application fails and is hereby dismissed. ( Alok Mah r a J.) 26.02.2026 Ujjwal